AI Economy to hit $3tr by 2030

News Image

MG News | July 06, 2026 at 10:45 AM GMT+05:00

July 06, 2026 (MLN): Global AI revenues are projected to reach $3.1tr by 2030, split across an application layer of co-pilots, agents and customer service tools worth $990bn, an intelligence layer of text, image and video models worth $495bn, and an enabling layer of GPUs, memory, data centre infrastructure and cloud worth $1.65tr.

AI adoption and monetization continue to accelerate and justify the scale of capital spending already underway. This is according to "The AI Economy: A Roadmap," a report by UBS Chief Investment Office's Jason Draho, Andrew Dubinsky and Paul Hsiao.

Employment growth for workers aged 22-25 in roles with high AI exposure contracted by roughly 7% between the fourth quarter of 2022 and the fourth quarter of 2025, even as their low-exposure peers in the same age bracket grew nearly 12% over the same period.

Every other age cohort recorded positive employment growth regardless of exposure level, making young workers the clearest casualty of AI adoption so far.

Part of the divergence may be tied to a decline in remote, AI-exposed entry-level positions rather than automation alone, based on separate research into remote-work patterns and youth unemployment.

Workplace use of artificial intelligence has crossed 40% and is rising at roughly 11 percentage points a year, a pace ahead of both the personal computer and the internet at the same stage after their mass introduction.

About 13% of workers are now everyday AI users, up 2 percentage points year-on-year, while firm-level adoption stands near 20% on a count-weighted basis, led by large firms and by information technology, finance, and professional services industries.

The eventual labour market impact of AI depends on four linked factors: how many tasks are exposed to AI tools, how quickly firms adopt them, and whether the technology substitutes for or augments workers.

Estimates of job-level automation risk vary widely by methodology, ranging from 4% of jobs under a framework combining high AI exposure with low adaptive capacity, to as much as 19% when considering both current and anticipated tools with 50%-plus task exposure.

Exposure is highest in computer/math occupations, followed by sales, business, and office/administrative roles, and rises with educational attainment: median exposure among jobs requiring a college degree is 45%, more than triple the 14% median for jobs that do not require one.

Despite that exposure, business surveys indicate AI is still overwhelmingly supplementing rather than replacing labour.

Asked whether AI had been used in the last six months to perform a task previously done by an employee, only about 10% of firms said yes, compared with roughly 44% reporting it was used to supplement or enhance an existing task, and just over half reporting no use at all.

The correlation between AI adoption or exposure and job growth has been low in aggregate: AI-exposed technology employment has been falling relative to private service-sector jobs excluding healthcare and AI-tech, while employment in AI-exposed construction categories tied to data centre build-out has been growing faster than the rest of the construction sector.

Total factor productivity growth has typically added to aggregate labour demand through final-demand and upstream effects that outweigh direct labour displacement, and periods of strong productivity growth, including the late-1990s IT integration era that averaged 2.5% annual productivity growth, have been neutral to positive for real worker compensation, according to OECD-based research cited in the report.

Behind the labour market data sits an investment cycle the report describes as an AI "flywheel": productivity gains drive adoption, adoption lifts compute demand, compute demand requires capex, and falling costs from that capex unlock further use cases, restarting the cycle. Energy supply and financing access are identified as the two most likely constraints on the loop.

Hyperscaler capital expenditure across AWS, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle and Tier 2/neocloud providers is forecast to exceed $5tr cumulatively by 2030, with AI-related capex now accounting for a growing share of total US fixed investment and technology-sector capex rising to roughly 37% of total S&P 500 capital spending.

Financing this build-out is drawing on the full capital structure, from free cash flow and public equity down to private credit and infrastructure funds, with big-five hyperscaler senior unsecured bond issuance surging past $150bn in 2026.

Data centre energy demand is expected to rise from 44 gigawatts in 2025 to 156 gigawatts by 2030, with associated energy investment estimated at $300bn in a base case, ranging from $200bn in a bear scenario to $600bn in a bull scenario.

Token usage, the basic unit of AI compute, has risen from near zero in October 2024 to nearly 8tr tokens by late 2025, with enterprise adoption governed by a straightforward cost-benefit calculation between the price of running AI models and the value of time saved on tasks.

AI's ultimate transformation of the economy hinges on the size of the productivity gains it can generate, since the same level of adoption produces a larger GDP boost the bigger those gains are.

US labour productivity has grown at 2.7% annualised over the past three years, more than a percentage point above the 2010s average, though the gain is attributed mainly to post-pandemic normalisation rather than AI, since adoption rates and efficiency gains have so far been too small to explain the increase.

Academic studies of AI's effect on task-level productivity find gains of roughly 25-30% across functions including coding, professional writing, customer service and business consulting, but translating these micro-level gains into macroeconomic productivity growth is contested.

Estimates of the aggregate annualised boost range from as low as 0.1 percentage points to as high as 2.8% points across separate studies by the OECD, IMF and Goldman Sachs.

Two distinct effects are possible: improved worker efficiency, considered highly likely, would level-shift output higher without permanently raising the productivity growth rate, while a boost to the pace of innovation itself, considered less likely, would sustainably raise the growth rate rather than simply shifting the output level.

The scale of any GDP effect is highly sensitive to assumptions about adoption timelines and efficiency gains: annual GDP growth effects range from as low as 0.5% under a 20-year adoption timeline to 2.3% under a 10-year timeline with high exposure and efficiency gains.

AI is currently lifting both growth and inflation, keeping the macro regime in reflation as a byproduct, but its longer-run effect is expected to shift toward disinflationary growth as productivity gains outweigh the inflationary impulse from capex and input costs.

AI-related investment contributed an estimated 25 basis points to GDP growth on average in 2025, though a substantial portion of that capex is spent on imported chips and equipment, which drags on net exports and reduced the net AI contribution to GDP to roughly zero over the course of 2025.

On inflation, AI is adding upward pressure in the near term through three channels: rising prices for data centre inputs such as memory and batteries, higher software and digital goods prices, with computer software and accessories prices up 14% year-on-year, and increased electricity demand pushing up utility costs faster than broader core inflation.

Medium to long term, these pressures are expected to ease as high input prices incentivise supply expansion and productivity gains begin to outweigh inflationary effects.

The impact on monetary policy is similarly two-sided. Current growth and inflation impulses are keeping the Federal Reserve from cutting rates as quickly as it otherwise might, while structural disinflation and potential labour market weakening from AI displacement are reasons to expect rate cuts further out.

On the neutral rate, higher productivity growth should raise it, but increased AI-related labour market and income uncertainty could raise household savings rates and reduce it, with the net effect assessed as likely a modestly higher neutral rate depending on the pace of adoption.

On fiscal policy, a one-percentage-point AI productivity shock could reduce the US deficit-to-GDP ratio by up to roughly 2 percentage points and debt-to-GDP by up to 18 percentage points by 2035, though weaker labour force participation could partly offset these gains.

Regulatory risk is also rising: survey data shows majorities across generations, from 81% of Gen Z to 57% of the Silent Generation, believe AI will reduce job opportunities, while opposition to local data centre construction exceeds support across Republican, independent and Democratic respondents alike.

AI is now treated as a macro factor affecting every asset class rather than a standalone investment theme. In equities, a group of AI-linked mega-cap names now makes up more than 30% of S&P 500 market capitalisation, raising concentration risk, while a clear performance gap has opened between perceived AI leaders and laggards.

In rates, AI capex is lifting growth and inflation in a way that tilts the Federal Reserve toward hiking rather than cutting in the near term, while long-end Treasury yields have historically fallen around major AI model release announcements.

In credit, hyperscalers have issued more than $100bn of investment-grade debt in 2026 alone, and high-yield technology sector spreads have widened relative to the broader US corporate average as investors demand a premium for financing the capex build-out.

In currencies, the US dollar has shown a strengthening correlation with AI-linked equity performance, showing capital inflows tied to US dominance in AI investment relative to China and the European Union.

In commodities, surging compute demand combined with limited near-term supply flexibility has lifted industrial metals and energy prices, a trend expected to continue as data centre energy usage rises more than fourfold by 2030 relative to 2020 levels.

Copyright Mettis Link News

 

Related News

Name Price/Vol %Chg/NChg
KSE100 186,814.54
128.33M
0.78%
1442.33
ALLSHR 112,877.18
349.66M
0.79%
885.32
KSE30 55,870.96
56.75M
0.84%
466.47
KMI30 265,114.11
49.72M
0.96%
2528.16
KMIALLSHR 72,806.47
223.49M
0.95%
682.38
BKTi 52,360.63
16.12M
0.68%
354.94
OGTi 38,490.97
6.12M
1.57%
595.07
Symbol Bid/Ask High/Low
Name Last High/Low Chg/%Chg
BITCOIN FUTURES 63,260.00 64,260.00
61,420.00
1605.00
2.60%
BRENT CRUDE 72.26 72.41
71.48
0.14
0.19%
RICHARDS BAY COAL MONTHLY 107.50 0.00
0.00
-1.50
-1.38%
ROTTERDAM COAL MONTHLY 122.40 0.00
0.00
-0.10
-0.08%
USD RBD PALM OLEIN 1,135.00 1,135.00
1,135.00
0.00
0.00%
CRUDE OIL - WTI 69.05 69.26
68.08
0.36
0.52%
SUGAR #11 WORLD 14.81 0.00
0.00
-0.04
-0.27%

Chart of the Day


Latest News
July 06, 2026 at 11:02 AM GMT+05:00

June RLNG prices jump 66% YoY


July 06, 2026 at 10:45 AM GMT+05:00

AI Economy to hit $3tr by 2030


July 06, 2026 at 10:30 AM GMT+05:00

Khyber Tobacco signs MoU with Korea's KT&G


July 06, 2026 at 09:58 AM GMT+05:00

OPEC+ output hike weigh on oil prices



Top 5 things to watch in this week

Pakistan Stock Movers
Name Last Chg/%Chg
Name Last Chg/%Chg